MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash: API Pricing, Limits & Cost Delta
Side-by-side 2026 engineering comparison between MiniMax MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Z.ai / GLM GLM 5.3 Flash—covering uncached input, cached prefix reads, output rates, max completion tokens, and live 30-day workload savings.
Interactive Workload Cost Delta Simulator
Side-by-Side Unit Price & Capability Matrix
| Dimension | MiniMax M3.1 Flash | GLM 5.3 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider & Release Date | MiniMax (2026-10-19) | Z.ai / GLM (2026-08-26) |
| Primary Workload Tier | Coding & Agent | Coding & Agent |
| Uncached Input ($ / 1M tokens) | $0.15 | $0.04 |
| Cached Prompt Read ($ / 1M tokens) | $0.015 | $0.03 |
| Output Completion ($ / 1M tokens) | $0.6 | $0.078 |
| 50% Async Batch API | Not listed | Not listed |
| Context Window (tokens) | 1,048,576 | 1,048,576 |
| Max Output Tokens | 524,288 | 131,072 |
| Function / Tool Calling | Supported | Supported |
| Strict JSON Schema Outputs | Supported | Supported |
| Reasoning Token Mode | Supported | Supported |
| Accepted Input Modalities | text, image, video | text, image, video |
Decision Rubric: When to Pick MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs GLM 5.3 Flash
When to choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash (MiniMax)
Select MiniMax M3.1 Flash when your workload prioritizes its Coding & Agent profile ($0.15/1M input, $0.015/1M cached read, $0.6/1M output) with up to 1,048,576 context tokens and 524,288 max output tokens (real-time synchronous execution).
MiniMax M3.1 Flash full pricing sheet →When to choose GLM 5.3 Flash (Z.ai / GLM)
Select GLM 5.3 Flash when your workload prioritizes its Coding & Agent profile ($0.04/1M input, $0.03/1M cached read, $0.078/1M output) with up to 1,048,576 context tokens and 131,072 max output tokens (real-time synchronous execution).
GLM 5.3 Flash full pricing sheet →Frequently Asked Questions
Is MiniMax M3.1 Flash cheaper than GLM 5.3 Flash for production API workloads?
On standard uncached rates, MiniMax M3.1 Flash bills $0.15/1M input and $0.6/1M output versus GLM 5.3 Flash at $0.04/1M input and $0.078/1M output. On a typical 1,000 calls/day workload (4,000 input tokens at 50% cache hit + 800 output tokens), GLM 5.3 Flash saves $18.22/month (75% lower).
How do MiniMax M3.1 Flash and GLM 5.3 Flash compare on context window and max output tokens?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash offers a 1,048,576-token context window with 524,288 max output tokens (text, image, video), while GLM 5.3 Flash provides a 1,048,576-token context window with 131,072 max output tokens (text, image, video).
Can I switch between MiniMax M3.1 Flash and GLM 5.3 Flash with strict JSON Schema tool calling?
Both models can be evaluated locally in DevToken: MiniMax M3.1 Flash (tools: Supported, strict JSON Schema: Supported) vs GLM 5.3 Flash (tools: Supported, strict JSON Schema: Supported). Always verify rate-limit headroom in the 429 Calculator before cutover.